Knowledge

2»

Comments

  • PAULOJOSE - it's a rethorykal questyion, ain't it ?

  • Actualy it isn´t. Of course I know BS is not going to answer it so in the end it ends up being almost retorical.

  • edited December 2016
    Gee, I have no clue what dangers exist in time travel, telepathy, astral projection and alien contact!
    Those things all sound perfectly safe! Wow! (SARCASM)

    Lol. It's kind of obvious a question THAT important should be answered though! I hope. I think? It's also totally not a rhetorical question at all.
  • Time travel, astral projection, alien contact... all those things sound like playing with fire.

    And fire can burn you, no?

    Also, try telling a family member or friend you can time travel and have contacted aliens.
    You know what they'll think?
    https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder413/61561413.jpg
  • I remember the day i was attacked by a nazgul like entity in sleep paralisys.

    Perhaps demonic attack is one of the dangers..

    But if we dont dare to go a step further we will remain dead forever.


    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ5kULVA01Q6gl-IErzl3SfMs3N4Xdgc0FRX5HfB4rhR3aVG2WAhzKfL5zX9A


  • Journeys are like that, whats not?
  • I recall BS commented this is our demonic shadow self...

    Mine was male and appeared a bit friendlier than OskrZS.

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ5kULVA01Q6gl-IErzl3SfMs3N4Xdgc0FRX5HfB4rhR3aVG2WAhzKfL5zX9A

  • cia = craiova independent artists
    lupta cu tine = the fight with your-self

    image

    = this grim-reaper is rus'ian, it dances kazachiok...

    image

    = &, this one is a composer - it's writing the kazachiok...


    = when hllary saw putin dres'ed as a grim-reaper at that pres'-conference, she panyked & yalled: "who are you?" - putin answered "i'm death, i came to take you-out..." - &, hillary - released - said : "wow, you, scared me like hell = i thought it's the i.r.s. - don' t do that, ever again..."

  • edited April 2017

    image
  • all i've got 'till NOW is 2 versyons of a view-over-it
    1) paulo coelho, in "the alchemyst" = whenever you wish something, the whole universe conspires in-line to make it hapen"
    2) umberto eco, in "foucault's pendulum" = the universe is a conspiracy against you
    = i mean... MAKE UP YOUR MIND, PEOPLE ! - i'm in a blurr already

    oh, & i also got this = absolute involvement is exactly & totally the very same with absolute detachment ...
  • We do have to face fire if we want to get warmth...Our fears have to be confronted and defeated. Almost always what we fear is not as bad as we thought it would be. After passing by it the relief is great, the sweet taste of victory.
    What others think of us is of very little importance, we have to leave that behind otherwise we don´t go forward. It is not easy to do. The best method to avoid problems in that area seems to be to remain silent about matters that are controversial with the non initiated. We can talk about matters dear to our heart in places like this.
    We are still in the Matrix, we are already upright in the pod looking around and seeing all the others numb in the pods.But we are still conected with the Matrix. The machine may be aware or not that there is something wrong wit us but it is not worried, there are a few millions like us, we will be dealt with in a few years time, that is if we don´t escape.
    It is tragic the choice we here have to do, to go in a path that will lead us astray from our family and friends or to remain in the Matrix logic of non evolution and alianation and ultimately of destruction. Either we are of this world or we are not, our choice. Jesus spoke about this.
  • oh... where  would i start from ? = matrix (?), escape... harsch
    - an "immortal" romanyan poet said : "the sphere is the symbol of imperfectyion"
    - i wonder how animals would roast ... the human shape (form&substance) 
    snake = look at them - they have ... bones, what do they think they are - iron-man ? &, those growths outta their body... yakh...
    caterpilar = &, those... legs - only 2 ? are you serious ?...
    octopus = &, hands  - "just the 2 of us" ?
    sheep = &, their eyes, looking forward only ...
    cameleon = sheep, just shut-up, ok ? - you, hibrid between me & them - eye-speakin'...
    squirell = &, they have no tail / horse = yeah-aha-ha...
    birds = &, that skin under their nose, what is that ? no beak, how do they eat ?
    several mamels = &, only 2 tits ... are they kidding ?
    crocodile, fishes, birds = &, they multiply without eggs ...
    mamels = shut-up, you - reptiles & ... flying-stuffs
    ...&, from this - all the animals start a general fight with each other...
    &, once again, man-cub did it - big-time... = ha,ha,ha ?
  • edited March 2019


  • Express yourself clearly and NEVER build upon poorly defined or arbitrary concepts?
  • No ledge to cling to.


  • “Only the hand that erases can write the true thing.” 
    ― Meister Eckhart
  • I try always to express myself clearly and never rely on poorly defined concepts, it´s the story of my life. I just wish that all the others I searched for did the same...Poorly defined concepts is what abounds everywhere, including here. I´m always asking for clarification but almost all that I inquire don´t clarify nothing at all either because they don´t know how or they don´t care.
  • look, yo... i just thought about this &... i gues' it does not depend on how clear, accurate & spartan any of anybody gester - not only words - or even attitude is = if any of the "audience" want, anything is suposed to be interpreted in any way
    = police wants to arrest me, "anything you say can & will be used against you" - i sneeze & police goes : " the terrorist tryed to spray a deadly germ over us, the people..." & get me in court & killed for terrorism
    = an audience calls me names & wants to beat me to death - i look at 'em without sayin' nothing = what would be to be said ? ... &, they say : " look at him, he defyes us...."
    = i try to explain a physics theory 'bout strings & positrons to a teenage public - of course 'ey will never give a ficke 'bout the theory or me, 'ey will mock & laugh, thinkin' 'bout da party of de evening...
    &on,&on...
    yeah, i gues' it's about who to share your ... expres'ing = it's about resonance, i gues'
  • paulojose...


    Boxing yourself in is your intent?

    To simplify the mind requires no words....
  • "I". "Me". "Mine"?

    The all seeing "i" is a very poorly defined concept.

    Wanker
    While "to wank" means "to masturbate", the term "wanker" is seldom if ever used in British slang to denote "one who wanks". It is quite wrong to infer from somebody's being a wanker that they in fact wank (and vice versa), but of course, fair to assume they do in any case. Herein lies the genius of the insult: if you call someone a wanker, it's probably true, but only literally. 

    image
  • CB, no, boxing myself is not my intent, don´t even know why you ask that. True, to simplify the mind words are not required, in fact they should be avoided if possible.But we live in a talkative culture, too talkative, the sound is unbearable.
Sign In or Register to comment.